sábado, 15 de octubre de 2011

Derrotas Culturales; de la amasadora del Viejo Di Tella, a la Menesunda de los Pibes Di Tella.







Torcuato Di Tella, padre.

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torcuato_Di_Tella


Sección Industrial de Amasadoras Mecánicas (SIAM) Di Tella.

La Compañía Allegrucci Hermanos y Di Tella se fundó en diciembre de 1910, cuando la Municipalidad de Buenos Aires promulgó una ley prohibiendo la preparación manual de la masa en las panaderías.

La empresa se dedicó inmediatamente a fabricar una máquina de amasar, y expandió su línea de producción a otras máquinas para la industria panadera y bombas de nafta.

En 1926, Torcuato Di Tella pasó a ser propietario único de la compañía, que se convirtió en Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada en 1928, cambiando su nombre a Sociedad Industrial Americana Maquinarias Di Tella Limitada o, como abreviatura, SIAM Di Tella. SIAM y sus subsidiarias operaron hasta 1971, cuando la mayoría de sus acciones fueron adquiridas por el gobierno.

Su actividad reforzó la industria metalúrgica tanto en la Argentina como en otros países vecinos (Brasil, Uruguay y Chile).

En Argentina, SIAM Di Tella fue la primera en producir ciertos artículos para la industria y el comercio, tales como diversos tipos de bombas (inclusive bombas para la extracción de petróleo), motores y artefactos domésticos como heladeras y ventiladores.

Su logro más impresionante fue la producción del automóvil modelo Di Tella 150014.

La empresa Di Tella se estableció luego de la masiva ola de inmigración a la Argentina que tuvo lugar en la segunda mitad del siglo XIX y hasta la Primera Guerra Mundial.

La mayoría de los inmigrantes provenían de la Europa meridional, y el grupo predominante lo constituían los italianos.

Aunque la política inmigratoria argentina favorecía la colonización agrícola, parte de los inmigrantes se establecieron en la capital y ciudades vecinas, y contribuyeron al desarrollo de la industria en el país.

No es ninguna casualidad, por lo tanto, que el período de inmigración coincida con los comienzos del desarrollo industrial de la Argentina15.

Argentina siempre ha tenido una economía basada en el cultivo de cereales y la cría del ganado, especialmente el vacuno y el ovino, y en el comercio de productos derivados, exportados a países industrializados de los que Argentina recibía, a cambio, productos procesados.

A fines del siglo pasado se estableció una industria destinada primariamente a proveer mercancías a sectores de la población que no tenían acceso a productos importados.

Durante la Primera Guerra Mundial, Argentina cesó de importar productos metalúrgicos, desarrollándose gradualmente una industria local.

Una vez concluida la guerra, dicha industria se vio en la necesidad de competir tanto con la renovación de la importación como con empresas establecidas en el país bajo los auspicios de firmas internacionales como John Paton, Good Year, Ford, General Motors, etc.

De hecho, hasta la Segunda Guerra Mundial, el gobierno argentino brindó su apoyo exclusivamente a empresas basadas en la producción agrícola tradicional.

Recién durante y después del conflicto, se comenzó a fomentar la industria local, como parte del proceso de creciente urbanización de la economía, sobre todo en torno a la capital, Buenos Aires.

Este proceso recibió particular estímulo con el ascenso al poder de Juan Domingo Perón, en 1946.

La industria local suministró no sólo mercaderías básicas de consumo como alimentos, textiles y muebles, sino también la mayor parte de los productos eléctricos y metalúrgicos necesarios para la industria misma16.

La empresa SIAM Di Tella Ltda. es probablemente el ejemplo más sobresaliente del desarrollo industrial argentino basado en capital local, cuyos logros bien pueden compararse con los de la industria norteamericana y británica.

Debido a ello, sus archivos pueden servir como rica fuente para el estudio de la historia de la industria en la Argentina en sus diversos aspectos, desde los económicos - tales como la conquista de mercados mediante la competencia con productos importados, la creación de productos y la adquisición de técnicas extranjeras - hasta el examen de la movilidad social de miles de empleados.

En este último aspecto, la empresa Di Tella se destaca como un canal de absorción de la inmigración, y como modelo indicativo de las relaciones empleador-empleado y de la política de bienestar social en Argentina: Di Tella Ltda. fue pionera en la concesión de beneficios sociales y el mejoramiento de las condiciones de trabajo para su personal.

En el momento de máxima prosperidad (1959), la firma Di Tella poseía 22 fábricas, que empleaban un total de 15.000 trabajadores en Argentina y otros países17.

http://www.tau.ac.il/eial/III_2/kroll.htm

http://www.izquierdanacional.org/articulos/0009.html

http://edant.clarin.com/suplementos/zona/2006/10/29/z-03615.htm

http://edant.clarin.com/suplementos/economico/2006/10/01/n-00701.htm

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,830162,00.html

http://www1.tau.ac.il/eial/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=268

http://lcgb.co.uk/scooters/americas.html

http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/pdf/1346/134612633006.pdf


$%&/$%&/$%&/$%&/$%&/$%&/¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Instituto Di Tella

The di Tella Foundation and its institute were created on July 22, 1958, the tenth anniversary of the death of industrialist and arts patron Torcuato di Tella.

Funding for the project, organized by his sons, Torcuato and Guido di Tella, was raised using the United States model of corporate financing, as well as by the donation of 10 % of the Siam di Tella corporation's public stock.

Its obective was initially limited to an arts program revolving primarily around the display of the di Tella family's private collections, which prominently included works by Henry Moore, Pablo Picasso, Amedeo Modigliani and Jackson Pollock.[1]

The board of the foundation consisted of family members, though the institute was directed by a board that included academics and intellectuals from outside the family.

Guido di Tella would serve as president, and the post of director of the institute was offered to Enrique Oteiza, whose family were leading Pampas-area landowners.

The foundation also received funding in the form of grants from the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations, after which the modest initiative expanded into theater and music, and grew to become the most significant cultural institution in Buenos Aires of the 1960s.[1]

The institute continued to influence prevailing trends in the history of Argentine culture, however, and it adopted and advanced a modernisttrend in various artistic disciplines.

Its audiovisual center, established in 1960, and directed by Roberto Villanueva, premiered with a play, El Desatino (The Folly).

The production's scenery backdrops were projected through slides, and introduced audiences to Nacha Guevara and Les Luthiers.

This format would be promoted in subsequent years for its ability to broadcast material through compact and portable media in a way that would stimulate a network of local groups active in the cultural field.[1]

Following its establishment, the di Tella art collection was transferred to the foundation, and Jorge Romero Brest hosted a free show at the National Museum of Fine Arts, which the leading local art critic directed.

The activities were transferred to a small office in the Museum of Fine Arts in August 1960, and this was followed by an annual award for national and international artists, many of which sold their works to the di Tella collection.

As part of the awards program, the winners were awarded scholarships covering study abroad and an exhibition of works in a North American or European gallery.

Growing local interest in Latin American art was accompanied by an initiative to show the di Tella collection across the Argentine hinterland, for which a minibus was purchased in 1963; the experiment, however, ended the following year, when the vehicle crashed in a rural La Rioja road.[1]

An initiative by Guido di Tella led to the institute's relocation into a modern, newly-completed Florida Streetbuilding in August 1963.

The offices were rented by SIAM di Tella at the northern end of Florida Street, near Plaza San Martín, a busy pedestrian intersection in the upscale Retiro district that could attract larger audiences.

The building was refurbished with the addition of three stage theatres, and interiors designed to be inviting, with a floor-to-ceiling glass panel façade featuring publicity photos taken by Humberto Rivas, and a large lobby.

The modern, air-conditioned building was propitious for exhibits and artistic events year-round. Its café, like the gallery, was staffed by attendants who wore no uniforms, and allowed patrons to smoke and take photographs at their leisure.[1]

Founded by classical composer Alberto Ginastera, CLAEM (the Latin American Center for Advanced Musical Studies) was made part of the institute in 1962, yielding numerous productions of dodecaphonic, electronic, and acoustic music; CLAEM attracted prominent international guest lecturers such as Aaron Copland, Luigi Nono, and Iannis Xenakis.

A visual arts center (CAV) was also inaugurated at the new address.

Directed by Romero Brest, CAV became the leading Buenos Aires center for the display and promotion for avant-garde creations.

CAV introduced art patrons to sculptors Juan Carlos Distéfano, Julio Le Parc, and Clorindo Testa, as well as painters Romulo Macció, Luis Felipe Noé, Jorge de la Vega,Ernesto Deira, Antonio Seguí, and conceptual artists such as Edgardo Giménez and Marta Minujín.

The latter garnered interest after earning the institute's first National Award in 1964, and became known for her "happenings."

Erotic in some aspects, and provocative to conservative local audiences, her early di Tella Institute events included Eróticos en technicolor and the interactive Revuélquese y viva (Roll Around in Bed and Live).

She then joined Rubén Santantonín in 1965 to create La Menesunda (Mayhem), where participants were asked to go through sixteen chambers, each separated by a human-shaped entry.

Led by neon lights, groups of eight visitors would encounter rooms with television sets at full blast, couples making love in bed, a cosmetics counter (complete with an attendant), a dental office from which dialing an oversized rotary phone was required to leave, a walk-in freezer with dangling fabrics (suggesting sides of beef), and a mirrored room withblack lighting, falling confetti, and the scent of frying food.

The use of advertising throughout suggested the influence of pop art in Minujín's "mayhem." [2]

Already established as the leading local center for pop art, the di Tella Institute also became a forum for art as political commentary.

This was dramatized by what became the center's most contentious display, sculptor León Ferrari's La civilización occidental y cristiana (Western-Christian Civilization), in October 1965.

The work displays Christ crucified not by the traditionalcross; but by a fighter plane, as a symbolic protest against the Vietnam War.[3]

A turn of historical events in 1966 proved detrimental to the institute, and to freedom of expression, when the civilian administration of President Arturo Illia was deposed on June 28 by the Argentine Armed Forces, and was replaced with the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Juan Carlos Onganía.

Moderate in comparison with many of his counterparts in other Latin American nations, Onganía was, however, a member of the right-wing Catholic power group, Opus Dei, and as such, found many of the developments in Argentine culture during the 1960s offensive.[4]

Sharing his distaste for modern culture was Luis Margaride, whom he named head of the Federal District Police, and who would be remembered for his crusades against nightclubs, long hair, and miniskirts.[5]

Facing a government policy backdrop such as this, numerous avant-garde artists (and others, particularly in academia) left Argentina, many never to return.[6]

A self-styled mazanana loca (city block of madness), the center's agenda remained active initially, and this new era was marked by the advent of the "Experience" – a fusion of the more controversial happenings with experimental theatre.[7]

The decline in audiences and contributions, as well as the Siam di Tella Corporation's own, mounting financial problems, led to the curtailment of most of its activities by 1969, however.

The Ford Foundation continued to support the institute, though these grants were contractually limited to social studies.

The director, Enrique Oteiza, and two leading board members, Jorge Sábato and Roberto Cortés Conde, resigned, and in May 1970, the famed Florida Street center hosted its last exhibition, a theatrical production by Marilú Marini.

The foundation was bankrupt, and only the sale in 1971 of numerous works from its collection of Gothic, Renaissance, and Baroque art to the federal government for 2.1 million pesos(US$500,000), staved off its liquidation.[1]

Remembered nostalgically by friends of the arts, and particularly during the "Dirty War" of the late 1970s, when repression of political terrorism quickly extended to dissidents and controversial artists, the institute's absence became a example of the "cultural blackout" described by writer Ernesto Sábato at the time.[8]

Following President Néstor Kirchner's appointment of Torcuato Di Tella (jr.) as Secretary of Culture in 2003, the idea of reviving the storied center was first plausibly disscussed by the president of the board of regents of Torcuato di Tella University, Manuel Mora y Araujo.[2]

Much of the 1960s-era documentation and numerous works had been stord by the library at the university, the di Tella family's surviving contribution to local culture, and the material's recataloguing was inititated in 2004.

New facilities were developed that year from a former water company building by one of the center's alumni, sculptor and architect Clorindo Testa,[9] and on April 21, 2007, the institute's center for visual arts was reinaugurated at the Figueroa Alcorta Avenue location with the Otro Modo (Another Way) Festival.[2]

Continuing to host media and conceptual art displays, the institute celebrated its 50th anniversary in March 2008.[10]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torcuato_di_Tella_Institute

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instituto_Di_Tella


Universidad Torcuato Di Tella

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universidad_Torcuato_Di_Tella

Textos de las imágenes del Instituto.

http://www.guiacultural.com/guia_regional/regional/argentina/letras/ditella.htm

http://blogsdelagente.com/lablogosunda/tag/menesunda/

IIº Imperio español, los Napias Castizos y un aporte de un Comentarista Anónimo.





Morenos en la madre patria? Yo no tengo ninguna duda desde hace tiempo, pero no lo podia calcular. Ahora encontre esta joyita...

http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/38465752


Asi se entienden mejor sus posts sobre la reconquista petrolera.

http://deshonestidadintelectual.blogspot.com/2011/10/radicales-alperovichizacion-o-ala.html


Desde ya muchas gracias; si son correctos los datos, muchas cabezas van a explotar, tendríamos restos de masas encefálicas salpicando a muchísimos protagonistas de los ambientes Económicos y Políticos; como susurra Omix.

La Nación = Deleuze + Guattari.


"El país va a necesitar muchos más ingenieros"

Lo afirmó el decano de la facultad de la UBA, Carlos Rosito

De Patricio Bernabé; hacer clic aquí.


"De continuarse con el actual modelo, como se prevé, ese número debe ser de por lo menos el doble", sostuvo.

"Aun cuando el crecimiento no sea del 8% anual, sino de la mitad, el país va a necesitar muchos más ingenieros", añadió Rosito, que fue elegido decano en 2006 y reelegido en 2010. Su mandato finaliza en 2014.Esta es la síntesis del diálogo con el decano:


Urgente, Capitalismo y esquizofrenia: El Anti-Edipo y Mil mesetas; para interpretar.


La filosofía es el arte de formar, de inventar, de fabricar los conceptos

………….

Es sencillo buscar correspondencias entre tipos de sociedad y tipos de máquinas, no porque las máquinas sean determinantes, sino porque expresan las formaciones sociales que las han originado y que las utilizan.

Las antiguas sociedades de soberanía operaban con máquinas simples, palancas, poleas, relojes; las sociedades disciplinarias posteriores se equiparon con máquinas energéticas, con el riesgo pasivo de la entropía y el riesgo activo del sabotaje; las sociedades de control actúan mediante máquinas de un tercer tipo, máquinas informáticas y ordenadores cuyo riesgo pasivo son las interferencias y cuyo riesgo activo son la piratería y la inoculación de virus.

No es solamente una evolución tecnológica, es una profunda mutación del capitalismo.

…………

Lo que define a un sistema político es el camino por el que su sociedad ha transitado